RankedBeatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot P300 Ultra
Key facts
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra (Beatbot; Shipping) and Beatbot P300 Ultra (Beatbot; Shipping) are both robotic pool cleaners. Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres); charge time 4.5 h vs 4.5 h (reported). Published for only one of them: filter fineness (Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra: 150 µm). Price: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra US$2,299, US (official store sale price); Beatbot P300 Ultra US$3,150, US (official price). RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra #7 of 18 (score 52.4, grade B), Beatbot P300 Ultra #2 of 18 (score 55.7, grade C). Disclosure: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has 16 sourced values (80% of tracked fields), Beatbot P300 Ultra has 13 (68%).
Cite: RankedRobot, https://rankedrobot.com/compare/beatbot-aquasense-2-ultra-vs-beatbot-p300-ultra/ (checked 2026-09-29) · Every figure below links to its source · Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra spec sheet · Beatbot P300 Ultra spec sheet
| Spec | Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra | Beatbot P300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Shipping | Shipping |
| Price | US$2,299, US (official store sale price) source US$3,150, US (official price) source | US$3,150, US (official price) source |
| Rank in category | #7 of 18 · 52.4 · grade B | #2 of 18 · 55.7 · grade C |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | ||
| Status | ||
| Body | ||
| Weight | ||
| IP rating | Not tracked | |
| Cleaning | ||
| Pool types | ||
| Max pool area | 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres)ManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)Maker's figure is an "up to" value. | 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres)ManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-29)Maker's figure is an "up to" value. |
| Cleans | ||
| Navigation | HybridSense™ AI Pool Mapping with 27 Sensors · AI Cruise Debris DetectionManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-23) | |
| Filter fineness | ||
| Power & use | ||
| Power | ||
| Runtime by mode | Surface: 10 h · Floor: 5 h · Walls waterline: 5 hManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)Conditions: Per mode, on a full charge | |
| Charge time | ||
| Retrieval | ||
| Connectivity | Not tracked | |
| Warranty | ||
Confidence labels: Manufacturer = stated by the maker · Verified = independently confirmed · Reported = credible media or retailer, not confirmed by the maker · ⚠ Unconfirmed = leak or single source · Not disclosed = not published. We never estimate missing figures. Add more robots to this comparison.
Quick answers
What is the difference between the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra and the Beatbot P300 Ultra?
Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres); charge time 4.5 h vs 4.5 h (reported). Published for only one of them: filter fineness (Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra: 150 µm).
Which is cheaper, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra or the Beatbot P300 Ultra?
Price: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra US$2,299, US (official store sale price); Beatbot P300 Ultra US$3,150, US (official price). Prices are shown exactly as published, never converted or estimated.
Which ranks higher, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra or the Beatbot P300 Ultra?
RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra #7 of 18 (score 52.4, grade B), Beatbot P300 Ultra #2 of 18 (score 55.7, grade C). Method: https://rankedrobot.com/robot500/#method
Other comparisons
- Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Degrii Zima Lite
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs WYBOT S2
- Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot P300 Ultra
- Beatbot P300 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot P300 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot P300 Ultra vs Degrii Zima Lite
- Beatbot P300 Ultra vs WYBOT S2
Spotted an error? Email [email protected] — every correction is published in our corrections log.