RankedRobot

How we source and present specifications

Sources

Confidence labels

Label Meaning
Manufacturer Stated by the maker in a primary source
Verified Confirmed independently of the maker (our own measurement or an accredited test report)
Estimate Calculated by us from official figures, e.g. battery Wh from mAh × volts. The method is shown
Reported From a credible media outlet, retailer or trade show; not confirmed by the maker
⚠ Unconfirmed A leak, rumour or single source. Treat with caution
Not disclosed The maker hasn't published it. We don't guess

Most of our figures are the makers' own; the current share is shown on the Robot 500 page.

Definitions that matter

Quality control

Each record is built by one research pass and re-checked value by value against its sources by a separate quality-control pass before publication. We track our error rate, and every correction is logged publicly in our corrections log. What the data and rankings can't tell you yet is listed on our known limitations page.

Comparisons and rankings

We create comparison pages only for robots people genuinely weigh against each other, not every possible pairing.

Our robot rankings, the Robot 500, are computed only from the sourced data on this site, using a published method: robots are compared only with others of the same kind, on sourced performance (70%) and real-world proof such as sales, deployments and certifications (30%). Each rank carries an evidence grade, and robots with too little evidence are listed on a watchlist, not ranked. The full formula, weights and version history are on the Robot 500 method section. No company can pay for a better position, there are no manual overrides, and the criteria change at most once a year, announced in advance. Sponsorship, if we ever accept it, will never affect results.