RankedBeatbot P300 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
Key facts
Beatbot P300 Ultra (Beatbot; Shipping) and Beatbot Sora 70 (Beatbot; Shipping) are both robotic pool cleaners. Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 300 m² (3,229 ft² · 0.07 acres); charge time 4.5 h (reported) vs 4.5 h. Published for only one of them: weight (Beatbot Sora 70: 10.5 kg (23 lb)); filter fineness (Beatbot Sora 70: 150 µm). Price: Beatbot P300 Ultra US$3,150, US (official price); Beatbot Sora 70 US$1,099, US (official store sale price). RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot P300 Ultra #2 of 18 (score 55.7, grade C), Beatbot Sora 70 #5 of 18 (score 52.6, grade B). Disclosure: Beatbot P300 Ultra has 13 sourced values (68% of tracked fields), Beatbot Sora 70 has 22 (88%).
Cite: RankedRobot, https://rankedrobot.com/compare/beatbot-p300-ultra-vs-beatbot-sora-70/ (checked 2026-09-29) · Every figure below links to its source · Beatbot P300 Ultra spec sheet · Beatbot Sora 70 spec sheet
| Spec | Beatbot P300 Ultra | Beatbot Sora 70 |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Shipping | Shipping |
| Price | US$3,150, US (official price) source | US$1,099, US (official store sale price) source US$1,499, US (official price) source |
| Rank in category | #2 of 18 · 55.7 · grade C | #5 of 18 · 52.6 · grade B |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | ||
| Status | ||
| Body | ||
| Dimensions | Not tracked | |
| Weight | ||
| IP rating | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Pool types | ||
| Max pool area | 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres)ManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-29)Maker's figure is an "up to" value. | |
| Cleans | ||
| Navigation | HybridSense™ AI Pool Mapping with 27 Sensors · AI Cruise Debris DetectionManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-23) | SonicSense AI ultrasonic obstacle avoidance · S-shaped pathManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-29) |
| Filter fineness | ||
| Filter capacity | Not tracked | |
| Power & use | ||
| Power | ||
| Runtime by mode | ||
| Charge time | ||
| Retrieval | water surface parking/remote control · one-touch app retrievalManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-29) | |
| Connectivity | Not tracked | |
| Warranty | ||
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not tracked | |
| Commercial | ||
| Regions sold | Not tracked | |
Confidence labels: Manufacturer = stated by the maker · Verified = independently confirmed · Reported = credible media or retailer, not confirmed by the maker · ⚠ Unconfirmed = leak or single source · Not disclosed = not published. We never estimate missing figures. Add more robots to this comparison.
Quick answers
What is the difference between the Beatbot P300 Ultra and the Beatbot Sora 70?
Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 300 m² (3,229 ft² · 0.07 acres); charge time 4.5 h (reported) vs 4.5 h. Published for only one of them: weight (Beatbot Sora 70: 10.5 kg (23 lb)); filter fineness (Beatbot Sora 70: 150 µm).
Which is cheaper, the Beatbot P300 Ultra or the Beatbot Sora 70?
Price: Beatbot P300 Ultra US$3,150, US (official price); Beatbot Sora 70 US$1,099, US (official store sale price). Prices are shown exactly as published, never converted or estimated.
Which ranks higher, the Beatbot P300 Ultra or the Beatbot Sora 70?
RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot P300 Ultra #2 of 18 (score 55.7, grade C), Beatbot Sora 70 #5 of 18 (score 52.6, grade B). Method: https://rankedrobot.com/robot500/#method
Other comparisons
- Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot P300 Ultra
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot P300 Ultra
- Beatbot P300 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot P300 Ultra vs Degrii Zima Lite
- Beatbot P300 Ultra vs WYBOT S2
- Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot Sora 30 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Degrii Zima Lite
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs WYBOT S2
Spotted an error? Email [email protected] — every correction is published in our corrections log.