RankedRobot
Home › Compare › Robotic pool cleaners › Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ

Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ

Key facts

Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra (Beatbot; Shipping) and Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ (Zodiac; Shipping) are both robotic pool cleaners. Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 72 m² (775 ft² · 0.02 acres); filter fineness 150 µm vs 150 µm. Published for only one of them: charge time (Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra: 4.5 h). Price: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra US$2,299, US (official store sale price); Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ €1,099, ES (official price). RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra #2 of 11 (score 52.6, grade B), Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ #7 of 11 (score 48.8, grade B). Disclosure: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has 16 sourced values (80% of tracked fields), Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ has 11 (65%).

Cite: RankedRobot, https://rankedrobot.com/compare/beatbot-aquasense-2-ultra-vs-zodiac-voyager-re-4600-iq/ (checked 2026-09-25) · Every figure below links to its source · Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra spec sheet · Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ spec sheet

SpecBeatbot AquaSense 2 UltraZodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ
StatusShippingShipping
Price
US$2,299, US (official store sale price) source
US$3,150, US (official price) source
€1,099, ES (official price) source
Rank in category#2 of 11 · 52.6 · grade B#7 of 11 · 48.8 · grade B
Launch
Announced
Not disclosedNot disclosedChecked: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)
Status
Body
Weight
Not disclosedNot disclosedChecked: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)
Cleaning
Pool types
Not disclosedNot disclosedChecked: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)
Max pool area
360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres)ManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)Maker's figure is an "up to" value.
72 m² (775 ft² · 0.02 acres)ManufacturerSource: zodiac-poolcare.com (2026-09-25)Maker's figure is an "up to" value.
Cleans
Floor · Walls · Waterline · SurfaceManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)
Floor · Walls · WaterlineManufacturerSource: zodiac-poolcare.com (2026-09-25)
Navigation
HybridSense® AI Pool Mapping with dual TOF sensorsManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)
Smart sensors · patented cyclonic suction · helix brushesManufacturerSource: zodiac-poolcare.com (2026-09-25)
Filter fineness
Power & use
Power
Cordless (battery)ManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)
Runtime by mode
Surface: 10 h · Floor: 5 h · Walls waterline: 5 hManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)Conditions: Per mode, on a full charge
all/unspecified: 2.5 h · Floor: 90 minManufacturerSource: zodiac-poolcare.com (2026-09-25)
Charge time
Retrieval
Smart Return — automatically parks at the pool's edgeManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-24)
Not tracked
Connectivity
WarrantyNot tracked

Confidence labels: Manufacturer = stated by the maker · Verified = independently confirmed · Reported = credible media or retailer, not confirmed by the maker · ⚠ Unconfirmed = leak or single source · Not disclosed = not published. We never estimate missing figures. Add more robots to this comparison.

Quick answers

What is the difference between the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra and the Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ?

Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 72 m² (775 ft² · 0.02 acres); filter fineness 150 µm vs 150 µm. Published for only one of them: charge time (Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra: 4.5 h).

Which is cheaper, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra or the Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ?

Price: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra US$2,299, US (official store sale price); Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ €1,099, ES (official price). Prices are shown exactly as published, never converted or estimated.

Which ranks higher, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra or the Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ?

RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra #2 of 11 (score 52.6, grade B), Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ #7 of 11 (score 48.8, grade B). Method: https://rankedrobot.com/robot500/#method

Other comparisons

Spotted an error? Email [email protected] — every correction is published in our corrections log.