RankedBeatbot AquaSense X vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ
Key facts
Beatbot AquaSense X (Beatbot; Shipping) and Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ (Zodiac; Shipping) are both robotic pool cleaners. Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 72 m² (775 ft² · 0.02 acres); filter fineness 150 µm vs 150 µm. Published for only one of them: weight (Beatbot AquaSense X: 13.1 kg (29 lb)); charge time (Beatbot AquaSense X: 4.5 h). Price: Beatbot AquaSense X US$3,999, US (official store sale price); Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ €1,099, ES (official price). RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot AquaSense X #3 of 11 (score 52.6, grade B), Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ #7 of 11 (score 48.8, grade B). Disclosure: Beatbot AquaSense X has 20 sourced values (91% of tracked fields), Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ has 11 (65%).
Cite: RankedRobot, https://rankedrobot.com/compare/beatbot-aquasense-x-vs-zodiac-voyager-re-4600-iq/ (checked 2026-09-25) · Every figure below links to its source · Beatbot AquaSense X spec sheet · Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ spec sheet
| Spec | Beatbot AquaSense X | Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Shipping | Shipping |
| Price | US$3,999, US (official store sale price) source US$4,250, US (official price) source | €1,099, ES (official price) source |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 · 52.6 · grade B | #7 of 11 · 48.8 · grade B |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | ||
| Status | ||
| Body | ||
| Dimensions | Not tracked | |
| Weight | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Pool types | ||
| Max pool area | 72 m² (775 ft² · 0.02 acres)ManufacturerSource: zodiac-poolcare.com (2026-09-25)Maker's figure is an "up to" value. | |
| Cleans | ||
| Navigation | Smart sensors · patented cyclonic suction · helix brushesManufacturerSource: zodiac-poolcare.com (2026-09-25) | |
| Filter fineness | ||
| Filter capacity | Not tracked | |
| Power & use | ||
| Power | ||
| Runtime by mode | Surface: 10 h · Floor: 5 h · Walls waterline: 5 hManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-23)Conditions: Per mode, on a full charge | |
| Charge time | ||
| Retrieval | Automatically returns to pool edge and parks above waterManufacturerSource: beatbot.com (2026-09-23) | Not tracked |
| Connectivity | ||
| Warranty | Not tracked | |
Confidence labels: Manufacturer = stated by the maker · Verified = independently confirmed · Reported = credible media or retailer, not confirmed by the maker · ⚠ Unconfirmed = leak or single source · Not disclosed = not published. We never estimate missing figures. Add more robots to this comparison.
Quick answers
What is the difference between the Beatbot AquaSense X and the Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ?
Published figures: pool area 360 m² (3,875 ft² · 0.09 acres) vs 72 m² (775 ft² · 0.02 acres); filter fineness 150 µm vs 150 µm. Published for only one of them: weight (Beatbot AquaSense X: 13.1 kg (29 lb)); charge time (Beatbot AquaSense X: 4.5 h).
Which is cheaper, the Beatbot AquaSense X or the Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ?
Price: Beatbot AquaSense X US$3,999, US (official store sale price); Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ €1,099, ES (official price). Prices are shown exactly as published, never converted or estimated.
Which ranks higher, the Beatbot AquaSense X or the Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ?
RankedRobot rank among robotic pool cleaners: Beatbot AquaSense X #3 of 11 (score 52.6, grade B), Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ #7 of 11 (score 48.8, grade B). Method: https://rankedrobot.com/robot500/#method
Other comparisons
- Aiper Scuba X1 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs WYBOT C2 Vision
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs WYBOT S2
- Aiper Scuba X1 vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ
- WYBOT C2 Vision vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ
- WYBOT S2 vs Zodiac Voyager RE 4600 iQ
Spotted an error? Email [email protected] — every correction is published in our corrections log.