RankedApptronik Apollo 2 vs Figure 03
Key facts
Apptronik Apollo 2 (Apptronik; Pilot) and Figure 03 (Figure AI; Prototype) are both humanoid robots. Published for only one of them: height (Figure 03: 1.73 m (5 ft 8 in)); weight (Figure 03: 61 kg (134 lb)); payload (Figure 03: 20 kg (44 lb)); runtime (Figure 03: 5 h); walking speed (Figure 03: 1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h · 2.7 mph)). Neither maker has published a price. Robot 500: Apptronik Apollo 2 not ranked (fewer than 2 sourced capability figures), Figure 03 #90 (score 55.4). Disclosure: Apptronik Apollo 2 has 9 sourced values (32% of tracked fields), Figure 03 has 17 (61%).
Cite: RankedRobot, https://rankedrobot.com/compare/apptronik-apollo-2-vs-figure-03/ (checked 2026-09-26) · Every figure below links to its source · Apptronik Apollo 2 spec sheet · Figure 03 spec sheet
| Spec | Apptronik Apollo 2 | Figure 03 |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Pilot | Prototype |
| Price | Not published | Not published |
| Robot 500 | Not ranked | #90 · 55.4 |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | ||
| Status | ||
| Units deployed | 350ManufacturerSource: figure.ai (2026-09-24)Conditions: cumulative units produced/allocated, as of 2026-04-29 | |
| Body | ||
| Height | ||
| Weight | ||
| Form factor | ||
| IP rating | ||
| Mobility | ||
| Max walking speed | ||
| Max drive speed | Not tracked | |
| Dexterity | ||
| Total degrees of freedom | ||
| DOF per hand | ||
| Payload | ||
| Carry payload | ||
| Per-arm payload | ||
| Compute & AI | ||
| Processor | ||
| AI performance | ||
| Teleoperation | ||
| Sensors | ||
| Cameras | Palm camera in each hand; wider field of view, higher frame rate and lower latency vs Figure 02 (exact counts/specs not stated)ManufacturerSource: figure.ai (2026-09-23) | |
| Microphones | Not tracked | Repositioned microphone for improved clarity (count not stated)ManufacturerSource: figure.ai (2026-09-23) |
| Power | ||
| Battery | ||
| Runtime | ||
| Charge time | ||
| Hot-swappable battery | ||
| Software | ||
| SDK | ||
| Safety | ||
| Certifications | ||
| Commercial | ||
| Regions sold | ||
Confidence labels: Manufacturer = stated by the maker · Verified = independently confirmed · Reported = credible media or retailer, not confirmed by the maker · ⚠ Unconfirmed = leak or single source · Not disclosed = not published. We never estimate missing figures. Add more robots to this comparison.
Quick answers
What is the difference between the Apptronik Apollo 2 and the Figure 03?
Published for only one of them: height (Figure 03: 1.73 m (5 ft 8 in)); weight (Figure 03: 61 kg (134 lb)); payload (Figure 03: 20 kg (44 lb)); runtime (Figure 03: 5 h); walking speed (Figure 03: 1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h · 2.7 mph)). Neither maker has published a price.
Which is cheaper, the Apptronik Apollo 2 or the Figure 03?
Neither maker has published a price. Prices are shown exactly as published, never converted or estimated.
Which ranks higher in the Robot 500, the Apptronik Apollo 2 or the Figure 03?
Robot 500: Apptronik Apollo 2 not ranked (fewer than 2 sourced capability figures), Figure 03 #90 (score 55.4). Method: https://rankedrobot.com/robot500/#method
Other comparisons
- 1X NEO vs Apptronik Apollo 2
- AgiBot A2 vs Apptronik Apollo 2
- Agility Digit 5 vs Apptronik Apollo 2
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs Boston Dynamics Atlas
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs EngineAI T800
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs Tesla Optimus V3
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs UBTECH Walker S2
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs Unitree G1
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs Unitree H2
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs Unitree R1
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs XPENG IRON
- 1X NEO vs Figure 03
Spotted an error? Email [email protected] — every correction is published in our corrections log.