Casio Moflin vs KEYi Loona Petbot
Key facts
Casio Moflin (Casio; Shipping) and KEYi Loona Petbot (KEYi Technology (now Loona Inc.); Pre-order) are both companion robots. Published figures: weight 0.3 kg (1 lb) vs 1.1 kg (2 lb); runtime 5 h vs 2 h. Price: Casio Moflin US$429, US (reported price); KEYi Loona Petbot US$699, US (pre-order price). RankedRobot rank among companion robots: Casio Moflin #2 of 7 (score 54.0, grade B), KEYi Loona Petbot #7 of 7 (score 40.0, grade B). Disclosure: Casio Moflin has 18 sourced values (90% of tracked fields), KEYi Loona Petbot has 21 (84%).
Cite: RankedRobot, https://rankedrobot.com/compare/casio-moflin-vs-keyi-tech-loona/ (checked 2026-09-29) · Every figure below links to its source · Casio Moflin spec sheet · KEYi Loona Petbot spec sheet
| Spec | Casio Moflin | KEYi Loona Petbot |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Shipping | Pre-order |
| Price | US$429, US (reported price) source | US$699, US (pre-order price) source |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 · 54.0 · grade B | #7 of 7 · 40.0 · grade B |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | ||
| Status | ||
| Body | ||
| Dimensions | ||
| Weight | ||
| Form factor | furry pet-like creature, no wheels or legs (2-axis head movement)ManufacturerSource: casio.com (2026-09-29) | |
| IP rating | Not tracked | |
| Companion features | ||
| Interaction | Responds to stroking, hugging and voice; recognises frequent speakers as owners; emotional AI with growing personalityManufacturerSource: casio.com (2026-09-29) | Facial recognition, gesture recognition, voice commands, object perception, creative/generative responses via ChatGPT integrationManufacturerSource: keyirobot.com (2026-09-26) |
| Voice assistant | Not tracked | Powered by ChatGPT (GPT-4o) technology, no named third-party smart-speaker assistant integration statedManufacturerSource: keyirobot.com (2026-09-26) |
| Mobility | ||
| App | ||
| Privacy features | Processes data locally; does not record voice content, converts voice features to non-identifiable dataManufacturerSource: casio.com (2026-09-29) | |
| Subscription | Not tracked | |
| Sensors | ||
| Cameras | ||
| Depth sensing | Not tracked | |
| IMU | Not tracked | |
| Microphones | ||
| Power | ||
| Battery | ||
| Runtime | 5 hManufacturerSource: casio.com (2026-09-29)Conditions: full charge; varies with interaction frequency and environment (Casio Japan)Maker's figure is an "up to" value. | 2 hManufacturerSource: keyirobot.com (2026-09-26)Conditions: "continuous playtime"; specific activity/load not further specified by manufacturer |
| Charge time | Not tracked | |
| Commercial | ||
| Regions sold | ||
Confidence labels: Manufacturer = stated by the maker · Verified = independently confirmed · Reported = credible media or retailer, not confirmed by the maker · ⚠ Unconfirmed = leak or single source · Not disclosed = not published. We never estimate missing figures. Add more robots to this comparison.
Quick answers
What is the difference between the Casio Moflin and the KEYi Loona Petbot?
Published figures: weight 0.3 kg (1 lb) vs 1.1 kg (2 lb); runtime 5 h vs 2 h. Price: Casio Moflin US$429, US (reported price); KEYi Loona Petbot US$699, US (pre-order price).
Which is cheaper, the Casio Moflin or the KEYi Loona Petbot?
Price: Casio Moflin US$429, US (reported price); KEYi Loona Petbot US$699, US (pre-order price). Prices are shown exactly as published, never converted or estimated.
Which ranks higher, the Casio Moflin or the KEYi Loona Petbot?
RankedRobot rank among companion robots: Casio Moflin #2 of 7 (score 54.0, grade B), KEYi Loona Petbot #7 of 7 (score 40.0, grade B). Method: https://rankedrobot.com/robot500/#method
Other comparisons
- Amazon.com Astro vs Casio Moflin
- Casio Moflin vs Enabot EBO Air 2
- Casio Moflin vs Enabot EBO X
- Casio Moflin vs Living EMO
- Casio Moflin vs Sony Group Corporation aibo (ERS-1000)
- Amazon.com Astro vs KEYi Loona Petbot
- Enabot EBO Air 2 vs KEYi Loona Petbot
- Enabot EBO X vs KEYi Loona Petbot
- KEYi Loona Petbot vs Living EMO
- KEYi Loona Petbot vs Sony Group Corporation aibo (ERS-1000)
Spotted an error? Email [email protected] — every correction is published in our corrections log.