Figure 03 vs XPENG IRON
Key facts
Figure 03 (Figure AI; Prototype) and XPENG IRON (XPENG; Prototype) are both humanoid robots. Published for only one of them: height (Figure 03: 1.73 m (5 ft 8 in)); weight (Figure 03: 61 kg (134 lb)); degrees of freedom (XPENG IRON: 76); hand DOF (XPENG IRON: 21); payload (Figure 03: 20 kg (44 lb)); runtime (Figure 03: 5 h); walking speed (Figure 03: 1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h · 2.7 mph)). Neither maker has published a price. Robot 500: Figure 03 #90 (score 55.4), XPENG IRON #53 (score 61.0). Disclosure: Figure 03 has 17 sourced values (61% of tracked fields), XPENG IRON has 13 (48%).
Cite: RankedRobot, https://rankedrobot.com/compare/figure-03-vs-xpeng-iron/ (checked 2026-09-24) · Every figure below links to its source · Figure 03 spec sheet · XPENG IRON spec sheet
| Spec | Figure 03 | XPENG IRON |
|---|---|---|
| Status | Prototype | Prototype |
| Price | Not published | Not published |
| Robot 500 | #90 · 55.4 | #53 · 61.0 |
| Launch | ||
| Announced | ||
| Status | ||
| Units deployed | 350ManufacturerSource: figure.ai (2026-09-24)Conditions: cumulative units produced/allocated, as of 2026-04-29 | |
| Body | ||
| Height | ||
| Weight | ||
| Form factor | ||
| Materials | Not tracked | |
| IP rating | Not tracked | |
| Mobility | ||
| Max walking speed | ||
| Dexterity | ||
| Total degrees of freedom | ||
| DOF per hand | ||
| Payload | ||
| Carry payload | ||
| Per-arm payload | ||
| Compute & AI | ||
| Processor | ||
| AI performance | ||
| Teleoperation | ||
| Sensors | ||
| Cameras | Palm camera in each hand; wider field of view, higher frame rate and lower latency vs Figure 02 (exact counts/specs not stated)ManufacturerSource: figure.ai (2026-09-23) | |
| Microphones | Repositioned microphone for improved clarity (count not stated)ManufacturerSource: figure.ai (2026-09-23) | Not tracked |
| Power | ||
| Battery | ||
| Runtime | ||
| Charge time | ||
| Hot-swappable battery | ||
| Software | ||
| SDK | ||
| Safety | ||
| Certifications | ||
| Commercial | ||
| Regions sold | ||
Confidence labels: Manufacturer = stated by the maker · Verified = independently confirmed · Reported = credible media or retailer, not confirmed by the maker · ⚠ Unconfirmed = leak or single source · Not disclosed = not published. We never estimate missing figures. Add more robots to this comparison.
Quick answers
What is the difference between the Figure 03 and the XPENG IRON?
Published for only one of them: height (Figure 03: 1.73 m (5 ft 8 in)); weight (Figure 03: 61 kg (134 lb)); degrees of freedom (XPENG IRON: 76); hand DOF (XPENG IRON: 21); payload (Figure 03: 20 kg (44 lb)); runtime (Figure 03: 5 h); walking speed (Figure 03: 1.2 m/s (4.3 km/h · 2.7 mph)). Neither maker has published a price.
Which is cheaper, the Figure 03 or the XPENG IRON?
Neither maker has published a price. Prices are shown exactly as published, never converted or estimated.
Which ranks higher in the Robot 500, the Figure 03 or the XPENG IRON?
Robot 500: Figure 03 #90 (score 55.4), XPENG IRON #53 (score 61.0). Method: https://rankedrobot.com/robot500/#method
Other comparisons
- 1X NEO vs Figure 03
- AgiBot A2 vs Figure 03
- Agility Digit 5 vs Figure 03
- Apptronik Apollo 2 vs Figure 03
- Boston Dynamics Atlas vs Figure 03
- EngineAI T800 vs Figure 03
- Figure 03 vs Tesla Optimus V3
- Figure 03 vs UBTECH Walker S2
- Figure 03 vs Unitree G1
- Figure 03 vs Unitree H2
- Figure 03 vs Unitree R1
- 1X NEO vs XPENG IRON
Spotted an error? Email [email protected] — every correction is published in our corrections log.